Pensions Advisers Mortgage Advisers Ethical Advisers Long Term Care Female IFAs

Search for an IFA...
Click on the pop-up menu to search for an IFA in the postcode of choice.




Article

INHERITANCE TAX CASE STUDY: MR JONES

Paramount Group Limited - March 2007
Financial Advisers in Leeds

Mr Jones is aged 60, is married to Mrs Jones, who is aged 58, and they have one Son, aged 30. Mr and Mrs Jones have a flourishing manufacturing business, which they have built up over many years and in which his Son also works. Currently, Mr & Mrs Jones have Wills made years ago which leave everything to each other.

Mr and Mrs Jones have savings and investments of £300,000, a property worth £700,000 and shares in the business valued at some £510,000 (Mr Jones) and £490,000 (Mrs Jones). They have income of £100,000 per annum with average outgoings of no more than £70,000 per annum. Also they have made prudent pension provisions, so they expect a comfortable retirement in due course.

Whilst the Son is happy to work in the business to support his Parents, he doesn’t have the same passion for it as his Father. Consequently, it is likely the business will be sold at some point in the future.

Mr & Mrs Jones are keen to pass as much of their wealth on to their Son as they can without incurring an Inheritance Tax (IHT) liability and without unduly impacting on their standard of living.

If Mr & Mrs Jones were to die in an accident in the 2007/8 Tax Year, Inheritance Tax of £280,000 would be payable.

This is arrived at as follows:

Savings and investments £300,000
Property £700,000
Mr Jones’ shares £510,000
Mrs Jones’ shares £490,000
  2,000,000
Business Property Relief 1,000,000
Taxable estate 1,000,000
Nil Rate Band 300,000
  £700,000
IHT on £700,000 @ 40% £280,000

The first issue to note is that there is only one Nil Rate Band applied, which results from the terms of the Will (and joint property ownership), which leaves all the assets in the hands of the survivor of Mr & Mrs Jones before they pass to their Son. There is no Inheritance Tax on assets passing between a Husband and Wife or between Civil Partners.

The first planning point, therefore, is for the Wills to be rewritten to make use of the Nil Rate Band on both deaths. This is usually achieved by creating a Discretionary Trust under each Will with each other, the Son and any Grandchildren as potential beneficiaries. In this way, the survivor of Mr & Mrs Jones has access to the funds, if needed, but if not they are effectively in the hands of the subsequent generations already. This would save £120,000 in IHT (£300,000 @ 40%).

The next planning point involves the Business Property Relief (BPR) (100% relief for assets employed in a trading company), as the above example assumes the business is still owned, but what if it was sold? The proceeds would become taxable, increasing the potential IHT liability by £400,000 (£1,000,000 @ 40%). To mitigate this, two things should be done, as follows:
  • The new Wills should include a further clause adding the value of the assets subject to Business Property Relief to the Discretionary Trust. In this way, if the business is still owned at the date of the first death, but subsequently sold by the survivor, roughly half of the value will already be in Trust without incurring IHT.

  • Consideration should be given to gifting shares to the Son now as any such gift would be exempt from IHT because of BPR. Great care needs to be given to Capital Gains Tax (CGT), as any gift is a deemed disposal for CGT purposes and there is no point in incurring CGT at 40% on the off chance of saving IHT at the same rate sometime in the future.
The new Wills need to be drawn up by an expert and, generally, Paramount Group only recommends Law Practices with a member of the Society of Trust & Estate Practitioners (STEP) in the Private Client department.

The final planning point is, assuming all the above has been done, there is still a residual potential liability of £160,000, so what can be done with this? IHT is a capital, not an income tax; consequently, there is an exemption for normal, habitual expenditure out of income. Mr & Mrs Jones can use their surplus income to fund a Life Assurance policy, which would be written under a simple Trust for the benefit of their Son (and his Children) and payable on the second death. On a reviewable contract, assuming acceptance on standard, non-smoker terms, the premiums would be £140.34 per month (source the Exchange). Mrs Jones life expectancy is some 25 years, so the total cost of premiums would be in the order of £42,000 for the £160,000 cover. Guaranteed premiums would be £223.28 per month an expected lifetime total of around £67,000.

No saving in IHT is achieved as such, although, if not expended on Life Assurance, the accumulation of surplus income would be exacerbating the IHT problem year by year. However, it can be seen that this is a cost-effective way of mitigating the liability without impacting seriously on Mr & Mrs Jones’ standard of living.

Clive Barwell TEP FSI Cert PFS
Director
Paramount Group Limited






Visitors are strongly urged to consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. Neither searchifa.co.uk nor any person involved with the running of this website can be held responsible for any investment decisions made by our visitors.

  Terms and Conditions

  © 2000-2007
  SearchCo